In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), cri

In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate a study. instruction below.   The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and evidence-based practice (EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative or quantitative study to critically evaluate, including making a recommendation for utilization in EBP.    In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate the study blow. Staff Practice, Attitudes, and Knowledge/Skills Regarding Evidence-Based Practice Before and After an Educational Intervention  Please choose one to critically evaluate qualitative or quantitative. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to EBP.  Use the Final Project Rubric provided below to help you develop and organize your final paper.  Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title page, body of the paper, and reference page.  Rubric or Grading Criteria: use each Competency as sub heading in the paragraph.    Competency 10.5 points 6 points 4 points 0 points Total   Evaluates credibility of research article   the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) p. 23 Evaluates credibility of research article   using most of the components (Greater than 2/3) of the evaluation checklist   in Houser (2018). Evaluates credibility of research article   using 2/3 of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018). Evaluates credibility of research article   using one-third or less of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) No paper submitted, content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Design p.23 Problem statement p. 104   Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using most of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser   (2018). Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using half of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser   (2018). Evaluates the problem statement and research   design using one-third or less of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018). No paper submitted, content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).   p. 75 Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).  Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).  Evaluates ethical issues in the study using   one-third or less of the  components  of the evaluation checklist   in Houser (2018). No paper submitted, content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates the purpose statement using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)  p.104 Evaluates the purpose statement using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the purpose statement using half   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the purpose statement using   one-third or less of the  components of the evaluation checklist in   Houser (2018) No paper submitted, content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates the literature review  using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)  p.117 Evaluates the literature review  using   most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the literature review  using   half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) Evaluates the literature review  using   one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018) No paper submitted, content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates the sampling strategy using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).  p.179 Evaluates the sampling strategy using most   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).   Evaluates the sampling strategy using half   of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).   Evaluates the sampling strategy using   one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018).   No paper submitted, or content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates the measurement strategy and   validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in   Houser (2018).   pp. 345,221 OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser   (2018).  pp. 411,437 Evaluates the measurement strategy in   quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018) OR.   Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using most of the components in the checklist components   in Houser (2018).  Evaluates the measurement strategy in   quantitative studies using half of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018).    OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using half of the components of the checklist in Houser   (2018).  Evaluates the measurement strategy in   quantitative studies using one-third of the evaluation checklist in Houser   (2018).   OR Evaluates trustworthiness of data in   qualitative studies using one-third or less of the components of the    checklist in Houser (2018).  No paper submitted, content missing.  /10.5   Evaluates how study results may (or may not)   be used to inform EBP.    Evaluates how study results may (or may not)   be used to inform EBP.    Discusses study results in general but not   how findings may or may not contribute to EBP.  Does not discuss results or how study   findings can inform EBP.   No paper submitted or content missing  /10.5   Competency 7 points 5 points 2.5 points 0 points