The Assignment: Examine Case Study: A Caucasian Man With
The Assignment: Examine Case Study: A Caucasian Man With Hip Pain. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the clients pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. At each decision point stop to complete the following: Decision #1 Which decision did you select? Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Decision #2 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Decision #3 Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources. Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients. Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. Complex Regional Pain Disorder White Male With Hip Pain BACKGROUND This week, a 43-year-old white male presents at the office with a chief complaint of pain. He is assisted in his ambulation with a set of crutches. At the beginning of the clinical interview, the client reports that his family doctor sent him for psychiatric assessment because the doctor felt that the pain was all in his head. He further reports that his physician believes he is just making stuff up to get narcotics to get high. SUBJECTIVE The client reports that his pain began about 7 years ago when he sustained a fall at work. He states that he landed on his right hip. Over the years, he has had numerous diagnostic tests done (x-rays, CT scans, and MRIs). He reports that about 4 years ago, it was discovered that the cartilage surrounding his right hip joint was 75% torn (from the 3 oclock to 12 oclock position). He reports that none of the surgeons he saw would operate because they felt him too young for a total hip replacement and believed that the tissue would repair with the passage of time. Since then, he reported development of a strange constellation of symptoms including cooling of the extremity (measured by electromyogram). He also reports that he experiences severe cramping of the extremity. He reports that one of the neurologists diagnosed him with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). However, the neurologist referred him back to his family doctor for treatment of this condition. He reports that his family doctor said, there is no such thing as RSD, it comes from depression and this was what prompted the referral to psychiatry. He reports that one specialist he saw a few years ago suggested that he use a wheelchair, to which the client states I said no, there is no need for a wheelchair, I can beat this! The client reports that he used to be a machinist where he made pretty good money. He was engaged to be married, but his fiancé got sick and tired of putting up with me and my pain, she thought I was just turning into a junkie. He reports that he does get down in the dumps from time to time when he sees how his life has turned out, but emphatically denies depression. He states you cant let yourself get depressed you can drive yourself crazy if you do. Im not really sure whats wrong with me, but I know I can beat it. During the client interview, the client states oh! Its happening, let me show you! this prompts him to stand with the assistance of the corner of your desk, he pulls off his shoe and shows you his right leg. His leg is turning purple from the knee down, and his foot is clearly in a visible cramp as the toes are curled inward and his foot looks like it is folding in on itself. It will last about a minute or two, then it will let up he reports. Sure enough, after about two minutes, the color begins to return and the cramping in the foot/toes appears to be releasing. The client states if there is anything you can do to help me with this pain, I would really appreciate it. He does report that his family doctor has been giving him hydrocodone, but he states that he uses is sparingly because he does not like the side effects of feeling sleepy and constipation. He also reports that the medication makes him loopy and doesnt really do anything for the pain. MENTAL STATUS EXAM The client is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and event. He is dressed appropriately for the weather and time of year. He makes good eye contact. Speech is clear, coherent, goal directed, and spontaneous. His self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect consistent to self-reported mood and content of conversation. He denies visual/auditory hallucinations. No overt delusional or paranoid thought processes appreciated. Judgment, insight, and reality contact are all intact. He denies suicidal/homicidal ideation, and is future oriented. Diagnosis: Complex regional pain disorder (reflex sympathetic dystrophy) Decision Point One: Select what the PMHNP should do: Savella 12.5 mg once daily on day 1; followed by 12.5 mg BID on day 2 and 3; followed by 25 mg BID on days 4-7; followed by 50 mg BID thereafter RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE: Client returns to clinic in four weeks Client comes into the office to without crutches but is limping a bit. The client states that the pain is more manageable since I started taking that drug. I have been able to get around more on my own. The pain is bad in the morning though and gets better throughout the day. On a pain scale of 1-10; the client states that his pain is currently a 4. When asked what pain level would be tolerable on a daily basis, the client states, I would rather have no pain but dont think that is possible. I could live with a pain level of 3.. When questioned further, the PMHNP asks what makes the pain on a scale of 1-10 different when comparing a level of 9 to his current level of 4?. The client states that since using this drug, I can get to a point on most days where I do not need the crutches. The client is also asked what would need to happen to get his pain from a current level of 4 to an acceptable level of 3. He states, If I could get to the point everyday where I do not need the crutches for most of my day, I would be happy. Client states that he has noticed that he frequently (over the past 2 weeks) gets bouts of sweating for no apparent reason. He also states that his sleep has not been so good as of lately. He does complain of nausea today Clients blood pressure and pulse are recorded as 147/92 and 110 respectively. He also admits to experiencing butterflies in his chest. The client denies suicidal/homicidal ideation and is still future oriented Decision Point One Complex Regional Pain Disorder White Male With Hip Pain Amitriptyline 25 mg po QHS and titrate upward weekly by 25 mg to a max dose of 200 mg per day RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE Client returns to clinic in four weeks Client comes to the office still using crutches. He states that the pain has improved but he is a bit groggy in the morning Clients pain level is currently a 6 out of 10. The PMHNP questions the client on what would be an acceptable pain level. He states, I would rather have no pain but dont think that is possible. I could live with a pain level of 3. He states that his pain level normally hovers around a 9 out of 10 on most days of the week before the amitriptyline was started. The PMHNP asks what makes the pain on a scale of 1-10 different when comparing a level of 9 to his current level of 6? The client states, Im able to go to the bathroom or to the kitchen without using my crutches all the time. The achiness is less and my toes do not curl as often as they did before. The client is also asked what would need to happen to get his pain from a current level of 6 to an acceptable level of 3. He states, Well, that is kind of hard to answer. I guess I would like the achiness and throbbing in my right leg to not happen every day or at least not several times a day. I also could do without my toes curling in like they do. That really hurts. Client denies suicidal/homicidal ideation and is still future oriented Decision Point Two: Select what the PMHNP should do next: Continue with current medication but lower dose to 25mg twice a day RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO: Client returns to clinic in four weeks Client comes to office today with use of crutches. He states that his current pain is a 7 out of 10. I do not feel as good as I did last month. Client states that he is sleeping at night but woken frequently from pain down his right leg and into his foot Clients blood pressure and heart rate recorded today are 124/85 and 87 respectively. He denies any heart palpitations today Client denies suicidal/homicidal ideation but he is discouraged about the recent slip in his pain management and looks sad Decision Point Three: Select what the PMHNP should do next: Change Savella to 25mg orally in the MORNING and 50 mg orally at BEDTIME Guidance to Student The client has a complex neuropathic pain syndrome that may never respond to pain medication. Once that is understood, the next task is to explain to the client that pain level expectations need to realistic in nature and understand that he will always have some level of pain on a daily basis. The key is to manage it in a manner that allows him to continue his activities of daily living with as little discomfort as possible. Next, it is important to explain that medications are never the final answer but a part of a complex regimen that includes physical therapy, possible chiropractic care, heat and massage therapy, and medications. Savella is a SNRI that also possesses NMDA antagonist activity which helps in producing analgesia at the site of nerve endings. It is specifically marketed for fibromyalgia and has a place in therapy for this gentleman. Tramadol is never a good option along with other opioid type analgesics. Agonists at the Mu receptors does not provide adequate pain control in these types of neuropathic pain syndromes and therefore is never a good idea. It also has addictive properties which can lead to secondary drug abuse. Reductions in Savella can help control side effects but at a cost of uncontrolled pain. It is always a good idea to start with dose reductions during parts of the day that pain is most under control. The addition of Celexa with Savella needs to be done cautiously. Both medications inhibit the reuptake of serotonin and can, therefore, lead to serotonin toxicity or serotonin syndrome. White Male Wit https://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6630/07/mm/complex_regional_pain_disorder/1.html#option1h Hip Pain
