Week 6: Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slide Show (grade
Week 6: Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slide Show (graded) Submit Assignment Due Oct 8 by 11:59pm Points 200 Submitting a file upload Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slideshow Guidelines Update 4/27/2017 Purpose The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to locate and compare performance measurement data on common health conditions for the hospitals in your area. You will investigate the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services websites and locate hospital compare data for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation and share the results of your findings. Opportunities for improving performance measurement indicators will be shared. Course Outcomes Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of high-quality nursing care, healthcare team management, and the oversight and accountability for care delivery in a variety of settings. (PO2) CO2: Implement patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional team through communication and relationship building. (PO3) CO3: Participate in the development and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to change. (PO7) CO7: Apply leadership concepts in the development and initiation of effective plans for the microsystems and system-wide practice improvements that will improve the quality of healthcare delivery. (POs 2 and 3) CO8: Apply concepts of quality and safety using structure, process and outcome measures to identify clinical questions as the beginning process of changing current practice. (PO8) Due Dates This assignment is to be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6. Points This assignment is worth 200 points. Directions Review information found on the following website related to hospital compare http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalCompare.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Read the information carefully and then locate the following website. http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Search for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences. Type in your zip code. Select your hospital and two others. Select hospitals/facilities and choose compare. If you live in a remote area and there are no hospitals listed within a 50-mile radius, select a zip code for a family member or a close friend who does not live near you. The idea is to review comparative data. Click on the following topics to learn more. Survey of patients experiences Timely and effective care (focus your search on two of the conditions that apply to services provided at the hospitals) Readmissions, complications, and deaths Carefully read the information provided. Develop a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8-10 slides. Include the following, keeping in mind what all this data means. Title slide with information pertinent to the course. List reasons to recommend hospital compare to consumers (patients). List reasons to recommend hospital compare to staff who may seek employment. For the slides below, clearly label them as Hospital A, B, or C: Summarize patient experiences data for each hospital. Summarize timely and effective care data for two conditions. Summarize data for readmissions and complications and deaths. List recommendations for improving data for one selected facility. Summarize what you learned from this experience. Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. The link to SSP CCSSS may be found in the course list in the student portal. Submit your PowerPoint slideshow by 11:59 p.m. MT, Sunday, end of Week 6. Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Presentations The following are best practices in preparing this presentation. Be creative. Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest. Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font. Review directions thoroughly. Proofread prior to final submission. Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy. **Academic Integrity Reminder** Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments. By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page. NOTE: Please use your browsers File setting to save or print this page. Rubric NR447_Performance_Measurement NR447_Performance_Measurement Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle slide view longer description Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member 10.0 pts Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing. 9.0 pts Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing. 8.0 pts Slide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing. 4.0 pts Title slide is missing. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons to recommend hospital compare to patients view longer description At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the patients perspective. 20.0 pts Three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the patients perspective. 18.0 pts Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to patients perspective. 16.0 pts One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patients perspective. 8.0 pts No reasons given are given to recommend hospital compare to patients. 0.0 pts 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons to recommend hospital compare to staff view longer description At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the potential staff members perspective. 30.0 pts Three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the potential staff members perspective. 26.0 pts Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the potential staff members perspective. 24.0 pts One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the potential staff members perspective. 11.0 pts No reasons are given to recommend hospital care to potential staff members. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to patient experiences view longer description Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences are thoroughly displayed. 30.0 pts Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences are clearly displayed. 26.0 pts Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C, and data related to patient experiences are briefly displayed. 24.0 pts Three hospitals are included but are not labeled appropriately, and data related to patient experiences are difficult to ascertain. 11.0 pts Fewer than three hospitals are summarized and no data related to patient experiences are included. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to timely and effective care view longer description Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and concisely applied to hospitals A, B, and C. 30.0 pts Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and somewhat applied to hospitals A, B, and C. 26.0 pts Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. One condition is named and somewhat applied to hospitals A, B, and C. 24.0 pts Only one or two hospitals are listed and labeled appropriately. Only one condition is named and applied. 11.0 pts No hospitals are listed or labeled, and no conditions are named or applied. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths view longer description Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are thoroughly displayed. 30.0 pts Three hospitals are labeled A, B and C and data related to readmissions, complications and deaths is clearly displayed. 26.0 pts Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to readmissions or complications or deaths (but not all three) is briefly displayed. 24.0 pts Only one or two hospitals are selected but are not labeled appropriately and data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are difficult to ascertain. 11.0 pts No hospitals are summarized and no data are provided. 0.0 pts 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations for improving data for one facility view longer description One of three hospitals is selected. Five or more recommendations for improving data are listed and thoroughly described. 20.0 pts One of three hospitals is selected. Three to four recommendations for improving data are listed and clearly described. 18.0 pts One of three hospitals is selected. Two recommendations for improving data are listed and briefly described. 16.0 pts One of three hospitals is listed. One recommendation for improving data is listed. 8.0 pts No hospitals are listed and no recommendations for improving data are listed. 0.0 pts 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of learning related to this assignment view longer description Thoroughly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data. 20.0 pts Generally summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data. 18.0 pts Briefly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; including value of data. 16.0 pts Minimally summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; does NOT include value of data. 8.0 pts Summary of learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain. 0.0 pts 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly writing and formatting view longer description All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check. 10.0 pts Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors. 9.0 pts Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors. 8.0 pts Numerous errors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are many indicators of spelling or grammar errors. 5.0 pts Many errors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand the meaning of the information presented on the slides. 0.0 pts 10.0 pts Total Points: 200.0 Previous Next
